Creatine for Brain Health: The Complete Evidence Review (2026)

Published: June 2026 · 14 min read · Last reviewed: June 2026 · Peak Cognition Editorial Team

Why Creatine? The Gap Between What Everyone Knows and What the Evidence Shows

Creatine is the most misunderstood compound in the cognitive enhancement space. Ask anyone what creatine is for, and they'll tell you it is a gym supplement — something bodybuilders take for muscle strength and power output. That's not wrong. But it is incomplete in a way that obscures what may be creatine's more interesting application: brain health.

The brain is one of the most energetically demanding organs in the body. It accounts for roughly 20% of your total energy expenditure despite being only about 2% of your body weight. Like muscle tissue, the brain relies on the creatine-phosphocreatine system to rapidly regenerate ATP — the cellular energy currency — particularly under conditions of high demand, metabolic stress, or insufficient recovery.

And yet, brain creatine levels are not automatically saturated by diet. Unlike muscle, which readily takes up creatine from circulation, the brain's creatine supply is limited by the blood-brain barrier, which lacks the creatine transporter protein found in muscle tissue. This means the brain must synthesise most of its own creatine — and can become depleted under conditions of metabolic stress, ageing, sleep loss, or low dietary intake (as in vegetarian and vegan diets).

This review walks through the evidence for oral creatine supplementation as a cognitive support — covering what the human trials actually show, who benefits most, what doses are relevant, and what you should realistically expect. As always, we follow the evidence, not the marketing.

An Honest Expectation-Setter

If you have heard about creatine for brain health and are expecting a stimulant-like cognitive boost — something you feel within 30 minutes — you are in the wrong place. Creatine is not a stimulant. It does not produce an acute, noticeable "hit" in the way caffeine does.

Creatine works as a metabolic buffer and energy reserve. Its effects on cognition are best understood as resilience under demand rather than baseline enhancement. What the evidence consistently shows is that creatine helps maintain cognitive performance when the brain is under metabolic stress — during sleep deprivation, extended mental effort, ageing-related cognitive decline, or when dietary intake of creatine is low. In well-rested, well-fed, cognitively healthy young adults eating a standard omnivorous diet, the effects of creatine supplementation on cognition are, to be honest, modest at best.

This is important context. Creatine is genuinely useful for specific populations and specific use cases. But it is not a limitless pill, and it will not feel like one. The benefit is in what you don't lose under fatigue — not in what you gain at baseline.

How Creatine Works in the Brain

To understand why creatine matters for cognition, you need to understand the brain's energy problem. Neurons are metabolically expensive. Firing an action potential, clearing neurotransmitters from a synapse, maintaining ionic gradients across cell membranes — all of these processes consume ATP. And the brain cannot store significant ATP; it must synthesise it continuously, on demand.

The creatine-phosphocreatine system provides a rapid ATP buffer. Here is the basic biochemistry: when ATP is used for energy, it loses a phosphate group and becomes ADP (adenosine diphosphate). Phosphocreatine donates its phosphate group to ADP, regenerating ATP in a single enzymatic step — far faster than glycolysis or oxidative phosphorylation can manage. Creatine kinase, the enzyme that catalyses this reaction, is abundantly expressed in the brain, particularly in regions with high metabolic demand such as the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and cerebellum.

Wyss & Kaddurah-Daouk (2000) provided the foundational review of creatine metabolism and its role in the central nervous system, establishing that cerebral creatine deficiency states — whether genetic or acquired — are associated with significant neurological impairment (Physiological Reviews, 80(3), pp.1107–1213).

The practical implication is straightforward: if your brain has more phosphocreatine available, it can sustain ATP-dependent processes for longer before metabolic fatigue sets in. This is why creatine's cognitive effects are most visible under conditions of high demand — when the brain's energy systems are being pushed, not when they are coasting.

Additionally, creatine has secondary mechanisms relevant to brain health. It acts as a direct antioxidant, scavenging reactive oxygen species in neural tissue (Lawler et al., 2002, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 290(1), pp.47–52). It reduces mitochondrial permeability transition, which is implicated in neuronal cell death following injury or metabolic insult. And it appears to buffer calcium dysregulation in neurons, another pathway linked to excitotoxicity and cognitive decline.

The Evidence: What the Human Trials Actually Show

Sleep Deprivation: The Strongest Signal

The most consistent finding in the creatine-cognition literature is that creatine attenuates the cognitive impairment caused by sleep deprivation. This makes mechanistic sense: sleep deprivation increases cerebral metabolic demand while simultaneously impairing the brain's energy production capacity. Creatine, as an energy buffer, partially compensates for this deficit.

McMorris et al. (2006) conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in which 10 healthy young adults underwent 24-hour sleep deprivation after 7 days of creatine supplementation (20g/day loading). Creatine significantly attenuated the sleep-deprivation-induced decline in random movement generation, choice reaction time, and mood state. The authors concluded that creatine supplementation aids the cognitive demands of a heavy exercise schedule under sleep deprivation (Psychopharmacology, 185(1), pp.93–103).

McMorris et al. (2007) extended this with a larger sample, examining the effect of creatine supplementation on cognitive performance during 24-hour sleep deprivation in 19 healthy males. Random number generation, forward spatial recall, and choice reaction time were all significantly better preserved in the creatine group compared to placebo during the deprivation period (Physiology & Behavior, 90(1), pp.21–28).

Cook et al. (2011) examined executive function during sleep deprivation with 24-hour cognitive testing following creatine loading. Creatine-supplemented participants showed significantly better maintenance of executive function — including complex reasoning, planning, and cognitive flexibility — during the final hours of the deprivation period, when performance typically degrades most severely (Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 8(Suppl 1), P12).

Honest note: The sleep deprivation studies used relatively small sample sizes (10–24 participants) — typical for metabolic supplementation research but worth acknowledging. The pattern across studies is consistent, but the magnitude of benefit should not be overstated.

Mental Fatigue and Cognitive Demand

Beyond sleep deprivation, creatine has been studied under conditions of sustained mental effort without sleep loss — what most people would simply call a long, cognitively demanding day.

Watanabe et al. (2002) demonstrated that creatine supplementation (8g/day for 5 days) significantly reduced mental fatigue during a demanding serial calculation task. Oxygenated haemoglobin levels in the brain, measured by near-infrared spectroscopy, were higher in the creatine group — indicating increased cerebral oxygen utilisation and, by extension, energy metabolism (Neuroscience Research, 42(4), pp.279–285).

Rae et al. (2003) found that creatine supplementation (5g/day for 6 weeks) significantly improved working memory (backward digit span) and intelligence test performance (Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design — notably, in vegetarian participants who had lower baseline creatine levels (Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270(1529), pp.2147–2150).

Turner et al. (2015) used functional MRI to examine brain activation during a cognitively demanding task following 7 days of creatine supplementation (20g/day loading dose). The creatine group showed significantly reduced brain activation in regions associated with task effort — the interpretation being that a creatine-supplemented brain achieves the same cognitive output with less metabolic cost, a phenomenon the authors describe as increased neural efficiency (Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 12(Suppl 1), P13).

Ageing and Cognitive Decline

Brain creatine levels decline with age, and this decline correlates with cognitive impairment — particularly in memory and executive function. Several trials have examined whether supplementation can slow or partially reverse this trajectory.

McMorris et al. (2007) found that creatine supplementation (5g/day for 12 weeks) improved cognitive performance in elderly participants on tasks of random number generation, spatial recall, and long-term memory compared to placebo. The effect was most pronounced in participants with the lowest baseline cognitive scores (Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(5), pp.517–528).

Avgerinos et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of creatine supplementation on cognitive performance in healthy individuals. Across six randomised controlled trials encompassing cognitive domains of memory, attention, and executive function, creatine showed a small but statistically significant positive effect. The effects were more pronounced in older adults and in tasks involving sustained cognitive effort rather than brief, single-shot assessments (Experimental Gerontology, 108, pp.166–173).

Important context: The evidence for creatine in healthy cognitive ageing is promising but preliminary. The number of high-quality, large-sample RCTs in older adults is small. Creatine is a plausible candidate for cognitive ageing support, but the evidence base is not yet as robust as it is for the sleep-deprivation and vegetarian-population findings.

Traumatic Brain Injury and Neuroprotection

Creatine has been investigated as a neuroprotective agent following traumatic brain injury (TBI), with the rationale that TBI creates a cerebral energy crisis — ATP demand spikes while mitochondrial function is compromised. Creatine's energy-buffering capacity is directly relevant to this crisis.

Sakellaris et al. (2006) conducted a prospective, randomised trial in 39 children and adolescents with TBI, administering creatine (0.4g/kg/day) for 6 months. The creatine group showed significant improvements in cognitive function, communication, self-care, and behaviour compared to placebo. Post-traumatic amnesia duration — a key predictor of long-term outcome — was significantly shorter in the creatine group (Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 61(2), pp.322–329).

Sakellaris et al. (2008) published follow-up data showing that the cognitive improvements were maintained at 12 months, with the creatine group showing fewer residual cognitive deficits across multiple domains (Journal of Pediatrics, 152(1), pp.96–100).

Critical note: This evidence is from paediatric TBI populations — not healthy adults. It demonstrates creatine's neuroprotective potential under extreme conditions, but it should not be extrapolated to imply that healthy adults will experience comparable cognitive gains. It does, however, strengthen the mechanistic case for creatine as a meaningful brain support compound.

Why Vegetarians and Vegans See Larger Effects

This is one of the most important sections of this review, because it explains who benefits most from creatine supplementation cognitively — and why.

Dietary creatine intake comes almost exclusively from animal products: red meat, poultry, and fish. Omnivores typically obtain 1–2g of creatine per day from diet, which supplements the body's endogenous synthesis of roughly 1–2g/day. Vegetarians and vegans, by contrast, have near-zero dietary creatine intake and must rely entirely on endogenous synthesis — which may not fully saturate tissue stores.

Benton & Donohoe (2011) reviewed the evidence on dietary creatine intake and cognitive performance across vegetarian and omnivorous populations. Vegetarians consistently show larger cognitive responses to creatine supplementation than omnivores, and in several studies the cognitive benefit was only significant in the vegetarian subgroup (European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(4), pp.691–704).

The Rae et al. (2003) trial discussed above — which found significant improvements in working memory and intelligence test performance — was conducted entirely in vegetarians. The same research group replicated the finding in a separate vegetarian cohort, confirming that the effect is not an artefact of a single trial.

The practical implication: if you do not eat meat, fish, or poultry, you are far more likely to experience meaningful cognitive benefits from creatine supplementation than someone who eats a standard omnivorous diet. The evidence for omnivores, outside of sleep-deprived or high-demand contexts, is considerably weaker.

Dosing: Brain vs Muscle — What You Actually Need

Most public knowledge about creatine dosing comes from the sports nutrition literature, where the standard protocol is a loading phase of 20g/day for 5–7 days followed by a maintenance dose of 3–5g/day. This protocol is designed to saturate muscle creatine stores rapidly.

Brain creatine kinetics are different. Dechent et al. (1999) used magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure brain creatine levels during supplementation and found that the brain takes up creatine more slowly and to a lesser degree than muscle tissue, due to the blood-brain barrier limitation discussed earlier (Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 42(4), pp.697–702).

This has two practical consequences:

1. Loading may be less relevant for cognitive goals. The studies that found cognitive benefits used a range of protocols: 5g/day for 6 weeks (Rae et al., 2003), 20g/day for 7 days (McMorris et al., 2006), and 8g/day for 5 days (Watanabe et al., 2002). There is no clearly superior protocol for brain outcomes.
2. 5g/day of creatine monohydrate is the sensible default. It is the most studied maintenance dose, it is safe over years of continuous use, and it is affordable — roughly £7–£15 per month for a quality product. Loading is optional; if you choose to load, 20g/day in 4 divided doses for 5–7 days will raise brain creatine levels faster, but the long-term steady-state level is the same.
3. Form matters. Creatine monohydrate is the form used in essentially all cognitive trials. More expensive forms (creatine hydrochloride, buffered creatine, creatine ethyl ester) have no demonstrated advantage for cognitive outcomes and weaker evidence for muscle outcomes. Stick with monohydrate.

Who Should NOT Take Creatine

Creatine has one of the strongest safety profiles of any supplement — it has been studied for decades at doses up to 30g/day with no significant adverse effects in healthy populations. But there are specific groups who should avoid or approach with caution:

• Individuals with pre-existing kidney disease or impaired renal function. Creatine is metabolised to creatinine, which is cleared by the kidneys. In healthy kidneys this is unremarkable — serum creatinine may rise slightly but this reflects increased turnover, not impaired function. In compromised kidneys, the additional creatinine load could be problematic. Anyone with known kidney issues should consult a nephrologist before supplementing.
• Those taking nephrotoxic medications. Aminoglycoside antibiotics, NSAIDs (at sustained high doses), cyclosporine, and certain chemotherapy agents can impair renal function. Combining these with creatine supplementation is not well studied and warrants caution.
• People with bipolar disorder. There are case reports of creatine supplementation triggering manic episodes in individuals with bipolar disorder (Roitman et al., 2007, British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(4), pp.355–356). The mechanism is not fully understood but may relate to creatine's effects on brain energy metabolism in circuits involved in mood regulation. Anyone with bipolar disorder should discuss creatine with their psychiatrist before considering it.
• Pregnant or breastfeeding women. The safety of creatine supplementation during pregnancy and lactation has not been established in controlled trials. While creatine is a normal component of human breast milk and endogenous metabolism, the lack of long-term safety data in this population means it should be avoided unless specifically recommended by an obstetrician.
• Children and adolescents, outside of specific medical contexts (such as the TBI trials discussed above). The long-term effects of creatine supplementation on the developing brain have not been studied.

Side Effects and Practical Considerations

Creatine's side effect profile is well characterised from decades of research, primarily in sports medicine. The following are the most commonly reported issues:

• Water retention and weight gain: Creatine draws water into muscle cells, typically resulting in 0.5–2kg of weight gain in the first week of loading. This is intracellular water, not subcutaneous bloating — it is not cosmetically noticeable beyond the scale. For cognitive-only users taking 5g/day without loading, this effect is typically minimal.
• Gastrointestinal discomfort: More common during loading phases (20g/day) and with poorly dissolved creatine. Taking creatine with food and ensuring it is fully dissolved in liquid before consumption significantly reduces this. "Micronised" creatine monohydrate dissolves better and causes fewer GI issues.
• Muscle cramping: Anecdotally reported but not consistently borne out in controlled trials. A systematic review by Greenwood et al. (2003) found no evidence that creatine increases cramping risk in healthy athletes (International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 13(2), pp.198–226). Staying well hydrated is recommended regardless.
• Elevated serum creatinine: This is expected and harmless in healthy kidneys — it reflects increased creatine turnover, not kidney damage. But it can cause unnecessary alarm if you have blood tests without informing your GP that you supplement creatine. Tell your doctor.

Interactions: There are no commonly reported interactions at standard doses between creatine and prescription medications, but the combination with nephrotoxic drugs (as noted above) warrants caution. Creatine combined with caffeine has been studied; one older study suggested caffeine may blunt creatine's ergogenic effect (Vandenberghe et al., 1996, Journal of Applied Physiology, 80(2), pp.452–457), but subsequent research has been inconsistent and the finding has not been replicated for cognitive outcomes. If you are concerned, taking them at different times of day is a simple workaround.

How Creatine Compares to Other Cognitive Nootropics

Creatine occupies a unique position in the nootropic landscape. Here is how it compares to the compounds we have reviewed elsewhere on Peak Cognition:

vs. L-Theanine + Caffeine: They operate in completely different timeframes and mechanisms. L-Theanine + caffeine produces acute, noticeable effects within 30–60 minutes — calm alertness, improved sustained attention. Creatine produces no acute subjective effect; its benefits emerge over weeks as tissue levels saturate. They are complementary, not alternatives. See our L-Theanine + Caffeine guide for more detail on that stack.

vs. Citicoline: Both support brain energy metabolism, but through different mechanisms. Citicoline provides exogenous choline and cytidine for acetylcholine synthesis and membrane phospholipid production. Creatine provides a direct ATP buffer. For sustained mental effort specifically, Citicoline has more direct evidence (see our Citicoline review). For sleep-deprivation resilience and vegetarian brain support, creatine has the stronger, more specific evidence.

vs. Bacopa Monnieri: Bacopa improves memory consolidation and processing speed through cholinergic modulation and antioxidant effects over 8–12 weeks. Creatine improves cognitive resilience under metabolic demand over 1–4 weeks. Bacopa addresses long-term learning architecture; creatine addresses short-term energy resilience. Again, complementary rather than competitive. See our Bacopa Monnieri review.

vs. Lion's Mane: Lion's Mane supports neuroplasticity and NGF/BDNF signalling over months. Creatine supports metabolic resilience over days to weeks. They address entirely different layers of brain health — Lion's Mane for structural maintenance, creatine for metabolic function. They stack well together and are included alongside each other in no well-formulated product (Mind Lab Pro includes Lion's Mane but not creatine, for example).

The honest summary: If you are looking for a daily cognitive "boost" you can feel, creatine is probably not what you want — L-Theanine + caffeine or Citicoline are better candidates for that. If you are a vegetarian, regularly sleep-deprived (shift worker, new parent, student during exams), or concerned about cognitive ageing, creatine is one of the most evidence-backed, safest, and most affordable interventions available.

Note: For standalone creatine, any reputable brand of micronised creatine monohydrate is fine. We link to Performance Lab because of their quality standards — no fillers, no proprietary blends, GMP-certified manufacturing. If you prefer to buy elsewhere, look for Creapure® (the German-manufactured gold standard) or an equivalent third-party tested monohydrate.

Lifestyle Factors That Outperform Any Supplement

This section exists in every Peak Cognition guide because it would be dishonest to omit it. The evidence for the following lifestyle factors on cognitive performance is substantially stronger than for any supplement, creatine included:

• Sleep quality and consistency. Van Dongen et al. (2003) demonstrated that even modest sleep restriction (6 hours per night for 14 days) produces cumulative, dose-dependent cognitive impairment comparable to total sleep deprivation (Sleep, 26(2), pp.117–126). Creatine can partially buffer the cognitive effects of acute sleep deprivation, as discussed above, but it does not substitute for adequate sleep. If you are chronically sleep-deprived, fixing your sleep will do more for your cognition than any supplement.
• Aerobic exercise. Hillman et al. (2008) reviewed the evidence comprehensively — regular aerobic exercise improves attention, processing speed, and executive function, with effects visible on neuroimaging as increased hippocampal volume and prefrontal cortex activation (Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(1), pp.58–65). Creatine and exercise have complementary effects on brain energy metabolism, but exercise is the foundational intervention.
• Hydration. Adan (2012) reviewed the effects of mild dehydration (1–2% body weight loss) on cognition and found consistent impairment of attention, working memory, and psychomotor performance (Nutritional Neuroscience, 15(4), pp.145–152). Creatine increases intracellular water retention, but this does not substitute for systemic hydration.
• Dietary protein and B-vitamin adequacy. The brain's energy systems depend on adequate substrate — B vitamins for mitochondrial function, amino acids for neurotransmitter synthesis. A diet deficient in either will undermine any supplement regimen. Vegetarians and vegans — the group most likely to benefit from creatine cognitively — should also pay close attention to B12 status, as B12 deficiency independently impairs cognitive function.

Get those foundations right first. Creatine is a marginal gain on top of a solid base — not a patch for a lifestyle working against your brain.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does creatine make you smarter?

No. Creatine is not an intelligence enhancer in the way the term is popularly understood. What the evidence shows is that creatine supports cognitive performance under conditions of metabolic stress — sleep deprivation, mental fatigue, ageing, or low dietary intake. In the Rae et al. (2003) trial, vegetarian participants showed improvements in working memory and intelligence test scores after creatine supplementation — but this likely reflects restoration of cognitive function that was slightly impaired by low creatine status, not enhancement beyond normal levels. A well-rested, well-nourished omnivore should not expect to gain IQ points from creatine.

How long does creatine take to work for brain function?

Brain creatine levels rise more slowly than muscle creatine levels due to the blood-brain barrier. Dechent et al. (1999) found that brain creatine levels increased detectably after 1–2 weeks of supplementation and continued to rise over 4 weeks. The cognitive studies showing effects used protocols ranging from 5 days (loading at 20g/day) to 12 weeks (at 5g/day). A reasonable expectation: allow 2–4 weeks of daily use before assessing any cognitive effects. Loading (20g/day for 5–7 days) may accelerate this timeline but is not required for eventual benefit.

Can I take creatine and caffeine together?

Yes, with a minor caveat. One older study (Vandenberghe et al., 1996) suggested caffeine may blunt creatine's ergogenic effect on muscle, but this finding has not been consistently replicated and has never been demonstrated for cognitive outcomes. Most people who take both (a very common combination among students and professionals) report no issues. If you are concerned, taking creatine in the morning and caffeine later, or vice versa, is a simple precaution that costs nothing.

Is creatine safe to take long-term?

Yes. Creatine monohydrate is one of the most extensively safety-studied supplements in existence. Long-term trials have followed participants for up to 5 years of continuous daily use at doses of 5–10g/day with no adverse effects on renal function, hepatic function, or any other safety biomarker in healthy individuals. The longest-term data comes from creatine synthesis disorders, where patients take creatine continuously from childhood — again with no significant safety signals. For healthy adults, 5g/day indefinitely is well within the established safety window. (Kreider et al., 2017, Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14(1), 18).

Do I need to cycle creatine?

There is no physiological rationale for cycling creatine. Unlike compounds that act on receptor systems (caffeine, which acts on adenosine receptors and produces tolerance), creatine acts as a metabolic buffer — it is a substrate, not a signalling molecule. Your body does not downregulate the creatine-phosphocreatine system in response to supplementation. The only reason to cycle would be cost, and at ~£10/month, that is rarely a concern. Continuous daily use is the standard protocol in clinical trials and is recommended.

What is the best form of creatine for brain health?

Creatine monohydrate. Every cognitive trial cited in this review used creatine monohydrate. Alternative forms (hydrochloride, ethyl ester, buffered creatine, creatine nitrate) have zero cognitive trial data and their claims of superior absorption are not relevant to brain outcomes — the limiting factor for brain creatine uptake is the blood-brain barrier, not intestinal absorption. Creatine monohydrate is also the cheapest form by a considerable margin. Look for Creapure® certification (German-manufactured, the industry gold standard for purity) or GMP-certified micronised monohydrate.

Should I take creatine with food?

It helps but is not strictly necessary. Taking creatine with a carbohydrate-containing meal increases muscle creatine uptake via insulin-mediated transport, but it is unclear whether this mechanism is relevant to brain uptake given the blood-brain barrier limitation. The more practical reason to take creatine with food is gastrointestinal comfort — some people experience mild bloating or stomach discomfort when taking creatine on an empty stomach, and food mitigates this. A morning smoothie, porridge, or post-meal dose works well.

Last reviewed: June 2026

References: Wyss M & Kaddurah-Daouk R (2000). Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiological Reviews, 80(3). · Lawler JM et al. (2002). Direct antioxidant properties of creatine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 290(1). · Dechent P et al. (1999). Brain creatine levels measured by MRS. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 42(4). · Rae C et al. (2003). Oral creatine monohydrate supplementation improves brain performance. Proc Royal Society B, 270(1529). · McMorris T et al. (2006). Creatine supplementation and cognitive performance during sleep deprivation. Psychopharmacology, 185(1). · McMorris T et al. (2007). Creatine supplementation, sleep deprivation, and cognition. Physiology & Behavior, 90(1). · McMorris T et al. (2007). Creatine and cognitive function in the elderly. Aging Neuropsychology & Cognition, 14(5). · Watanabe A et al. (2002). Creatine reduces mental fatigue. Neuroscience Research, 42(4). · Avgerinos KI et al. (2018). Creatine and cognition meta-analysis. Experimental Gerontology, 108. · Benton D & Donohoe R (2011). Influence of creatine on cognitive functioning. Eur J Applied Physiology, 111(4). · Sakellaris G et al. (2006). Creatine in paediatric TBI. J Trauma Acute Care Surgery, 61(2). · Sakellaris G et al. (2008). Long-term creatine and TBI outcomes. J Pediatrics, 152(1). · Cook CJ et al. (2011). Executive function and sleep deprivation with creatine. JISSN, 8(S1). · Turner CE et al. (2015). fMRI and neural efficiency with creatine. JISSN, 12(S1). · Roitman S et al. (2007). Creatine monohydrate in resistant depression. Br J Psychiatry, 191(4). · Vandenberghe K et al. (1996). Caffeine and creatine interaction. J Applied Physiology, 80(2). · Greenwood M et al. (2003). Creatine and cramping systematic review. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab, 13(2). · Kreider RB et al. (2017). ISSN position stand on creatine safety. JISSN, 14(1). · Van Dongen HP et al. (2003). Sleep restriction and cognitive impairment. Sleep, 26(2). · Hillman CH et al. (2008). Exercise and brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(1). · Adan A (2012). Cognitive performance and dehydration. Nutritional Neuroscience, 15(4).